TODD HIRSCH
  • About Todd
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • BIOGRAPHY and IMAGES
  • SPEAKING TOPICS
  • Spiders in COVID Space
  • Request Todd to speak
  • CONNECT
  • About Todd
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • BIOGRAPHY and IMAGES
  • SPEAKING TOPICS
  • Spiders in COVID Space
  • Request Todd to speak
  • CONNECT

Debating the ‘R’ word is a waste of time

7/17/2015

0 Comments

 

Many Canadians have experienced being on a flight somewhere warm and tropical and returning home to cold and miserable weather. Leaving Phoenix or Fort Lauderdale, it may have been 30 degrees. But as the plane begins to land at the Canadian destination, the pilot may announce, “The current temperature is 1 degree.”

You may ask “Did he say 1 degree? Or -1 degree?” At that point, the difference between water freezing or not will be meaningless. It’s going to feel much colder regardless of the negative sign in front of the digit.

The same is true with the current obsession over whether Canada is in recession. The normal definition of a recession is two consecutive quarters of contraction in the value of the gross domestic product. Even that definition has been challenged by some economists. And even if Canada avoids a technical recession, what does it matter? The economy is operating far below what it should be.

Economic management was the trump card for the federal Conservatives, but prospect of the “R” word in 2015 is turning the economy into one big liability. Prime Minister Harper cannot be too pleased with all of these economists debating whether or not we’re in recession. The opposition parties must be relishing the prospect of Statistics Canada “confirming” that indeed Canada fell into recession just as the fall election campaign kicks off.

Economists and politicians would do much better if we stopped obsessing over whether or not we are in recession. If the economy eked out a small bit of positive growth in the second quarter, but contracted sharply in the third quarter, we would have technically avoided a recession – but the economy would be in worse shape.

Rather than fussing and arguing over whether we are technically in a recession, the better question to ask is: “Why is the Canadian economy operating far below potential?” That’s a more difficult question – one that doesn’t produce a binary yes or no answer.

If it is any consolation to Mr. Harper’s supporters, the current underperformance of the Canadian economy has nothing to do with the federal government’s policies. It has everything to do with slumping world oil prices, disappointing export values and panic in places such as Greece and China. In other words, Canada’s lacklustre economic performance is largely not of our own making. The few bits of domestic drivers – the housing market, consumer spending, etc. – have generally been stable. External factors are driving this slump.

But while it’s true that most of the current malaise is due to factors beyond our control, it doesn’t give us the right to say, “Well, that’s just the way it is – nothing we helpless Canadians can do about it.” In fact there are things that can be done. They may not jolt us back to life this summer, but they’ll pay off in the future so we can avoid repeat performances.

Making our manufacturing exports more competitive would be one place to start. Despite the loonie now well below 80 cents (U.S.), exports to the U.S. have been a surprising disappointment. Why? Because much of our manufacturing sector is still largely oriented to production models of the 1970s and 80s. More niche manufacturing, more global supply chain integration and less costly production should be encouraged.

Another thing we can do is ween ourselves off such a heavy reliance on one or two global commodities (and I’m looking at you, Alberta). The slide in crude oil prices has left Canada’s main engine of growth a drag on the economy. But if the energy sector was enlarged to include not just hydrocarbons but also renewable energy systems and environmental management services, the current situation would be far less troublesome. What if Alberta was the world’s largest exporter of geothermal engineering services? Or if the world was beating down the door of Ontario companies for waste management services?

All of this is difficult to suddenly realize. There is no magic wand. But recognizing our economic weaknesses and our vulnerability to global market forces is a place to start. Arguing about whether we are in a technical recession or doesn’t change anything – and in fact, it may detract us from the more important work at hand.



This column originally appeared in The Globe and Mail on July 17, 2015.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    November 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    November 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011