The stronger pace of growth has been the source of much pride here in the West—and the nastier side of people can even lead to childish gloating that we are doing better economically than Ontario or Quebec.
But new forecasts from some of Canada’s private sector economists are now expecting the gap to close. Certainly the West will continue to have a faster pace of growth than Central or Atlantic Canada, but the difference may start to be less pronounced. A distinct moderation in energy prices on the Prairies and cooling of the housing market in British Columbia have scaled back growth forecasts for the western provinces. At the same time, better-than-expected growth for the U.S. has upped the forecast for Ontario and Quebec.
This narrowing of the economic gap may not be welcomed by some Westerners who (stupidly) want to see other parts of the country suffer while we prosper.
But it is a good development for three reasons.
The second reason why a smaller gap in regional growth rates is welcomed news has to do with the labour market. Because we live in one large country, workers are free (and sometimes expected) to move to where jobs are more plentiful. Alberta has been a recipient of thousands of inter-provincial migrants, and 2012 was certainly a banner year on that front. Saskatchewan, too, is seeing net gains in population from other provinces. This is generally positive, but if the pace of migration heats up too much, it starts to create other problems. With thousands of people moving into Alberta cities and towns, it is often difficult to keep up in the provision of housing, schools, and hospitals. The apartment rental market can get out of whack, punishing people on fixed incomes. Even transportation is strained.
But there is another problem at the community level—cities and towns are hollowing out in other parts of the country as workers leave those regions. If the exodus becomes a stampede, entire towns and regions can fall quickly into economic chaos. This poses real problems for provincial and federal governments when the citizens left behind expect solutions to their economic decline. Sometimes there are just no solutions to offer.
The third reason why a more uniform growth rate across the country is beneficial relates to the federal government’s Equalization Program. People are split in their opinion of this system of wealth redistribution; but if you love it or hate it, a more uniform growth rate is good news. If you are not in favour of the program, the better economic results in Central and Atlantic Canada and the moderating growth in Western Canada will automatically reduce the cash transfers from Ottawa to the HAVE NOT regions. And if you support the program, the narrowing gap in growth rates will temper the criticism and attack that equalization often sustains. The smaller gap could even suggest the program is working as it was intended to.
Fortunately, the narrowing gap in economic growth rates is being driven by positive factors. Somewhat slower growth in the West is actually a benefit in the long run—faster is not always better. And improved prospects for Central and Atlantic Canada is unequivocally good news. The more uniform economic growth rates are across the country, the easier it will be for all regions to get along.