Todd Hirsch     Alberta's Economist
  • About Todd
    • The Owl - A Daily Economic Update
    • Commentary
    • Books
    • Meet Todd
  • Speaker Request Form

Obama vs Romney: Who'd be better for Alberta?

11/1/2012

1 Comment

 
After having put up with seemingly endless months of political showmanship and campaigning, our American neighbours will finally vote next Tuesday for who they’d like as president. It’s an enormous decision for undecided voters, and, if polls can be trusted, the election could be extremely close. Few crystal ball gazers are yet willing to make a solid prediction of which man will win: the incumbent Barack Obama, or the challenger Mitt Romney.

A lot hangs in the balance of the Nov. 6 vote, especially for Americans. But the results of the election will have some implications in Canada and Alberta, as well.

Is it possible to gauge which candidate would be better for Alberta’s economy?
On the surface, Mr. Romney has taken a much friendlier and conciliatory position with respect to America’s need for Canadian oil. From the early stages of the Keystone XL pipeline proposal—which would carry Alberta bitumen to refineries and ports on the U.S. Gulf Coast—Romney has favoured the project. He even suggested that approving the project would be the first thing he would do as president (although, given the current state of affairs in that country, he could be forgiven if it was only the second or third thing he did.)

President Obama was decidedly less in favour of the pipeline project. Bowing to enormous political and social pressures at the time, he delayed the project late last year. However, by early 2012 he did give his blessing to the construction of the southern leg. That was taken as a general signal that his opposition to the project had weakened. He is, after all, a realist. And he knows that if America is to wean itself off Middle Eastern oil, the Keystone XL pipeline must proceed.

Some would suggest that Mr. Romney and his Republican party are more “free enterprise” and, thereby, conclude that with him in office, the U.S. economy would do better. There is scant historic evidence to suggest the economy does any better or any worse with a politically right-wing president (although some evidence suggests the stock markets perform better). And while Republicans may favour free enterprise, they are generally not free traders. Mr. Romney has made all sorts of remarks signalling that he’d get tough on China’s trading and currency practices. If a Republican-led administration starts slapping up import barriers against its trading partners, Canada could very easily be collateral damage. More so than Democrats, the Republicans strongly support a position of defending American jobs above all else.

That could pose all sorts of risks for Canadian and Alberta industries that rely on exports to the U.S. Under a Republican presidency, Washington may not restrict oil, but it is very possible it would target products, including steel, manufactured goods, lumber, wheat and beef. It was bad enough under President Obama and his “Buy America’ policies a few years ago. It could be worse with the Republicans calling the shots.

Neither of the two presidential candidates has clearly defined his plan to get Americans back to work, which, arguably, would be the very best medicine for the Canadian economy. But, perhaps, both could be forgiven for being short on details. After all, there is no magic wand to wave that would place millions of unemployed Americans back into jobs. If such a wand existed, it would have been used already.

On balance, though, there is unlikely to be much of a shift in the economy after Tuesday night’s election—either in the U.S. or in Canada. But regardless of Tuesday night’s winner, the real challenge for America’s politicians will be to set aside partisan differences and work together in Congress. Under current binding legislation, the so-called “fiscal cliff” of major tax increases and spending cuts will automatically kick in after January. The only way around that fiscal cliff is for the president—whoever he is—to work cooperatively with Congress—whoever they are—and arrive at a compromise.

If no compromise is reached, there will be no new fiscal arrangement. And with no fiscal arrangement, the fiscal cliff will loom unavoidably. That would almost certainly push the U.S. back into recession, and you know who would be dragged down with them. (Oh! Canada!)
1 Comment
James Van Leeuwen
11/4/2012 11:53:50 am

Todd,

Americans get the government leadership they deserve, and so do we here in Canada... we are democracies. From one presidential election to the next, what has troubled and frustrated me is the extent to which American citizens place ever more importance on the election outcome. It seems like they want to believe that there is indeed some kind of magic wand in the Oval Office that can solve their problems, and that the nation's future hangs on which candidate will be able to wave it the right way.

The political atmosphere on both sides of the border is satured with accusation, recrimination and other suffocating partisan flak, leaving far too little space for the oxygen essential to clear-headed thinking and discussion. All discourse around accountability, responsibility and leadership on the part of citizens has evaporated, and few seem to notice or care.

Once elected, which presidential candidate do you think would be most likely to level with American citizens about the central role they are playing in their nation's political and economic paralysis, and the extent to which the nation's future rests on their growing up and rising above cynical and small-minded self-interest?

It could be political suicide, but at this point in history I believe it's the only kind of government leadership that might make any substantive difference on either side of the border.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    November 2017
    June 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011

About Todd
Speaker Request Form 
The Owl - A Daily Economic Update
Meet Todd

Books
Blog 
  • About Todd
    • The Owl - A Daily Economic Update
    • Commentary
    • Books
    • Meet Todd
  • Speaker Request Form
✕